Index by review

My Rec.Arts.Erotica archive indexed by review

This is an index to the stories in my archive by the review on the original post. Each review is tagged with the reviewer's identification as found in the original header. sort(1) is responsible for separating the reviews by reviewer for each level. Now that I use perl to create this index, new entries should be more random within each level. The scale is 1 (worst) to 10 (best).

Please note that on some of the earlier archive entries all header information has been lost.

Archive names in [brackets] are non-stories. Archive names in (parentheses) are not officially designated names.

Michael: 10: Wow. Indeed. == la-princesa

Ava: 10: What he said. *applause* == heat-dmb

Ava: 10: utterly charming and genuine == tomboy

Ava: 10: unexpectedly circular and quite sweet == sweet-sarah

Ava: 10: Tales from the Sisters Grimmer. Sarah can tell me a bedtime story like this any night of the week.... == jahn-lrrh

Moderator: 10: still makes me smile. Brava. == poem-tragic

Moderator: 10: professional writing, worthy of publication == yng-painter

Michael: 10: Or, _A Young Lady's Primer On The Art Of Self-Love_ == fall-of-eve

Moderator: 10: marvelous, intricate plot and character work == screams.3

Ava: 10: Makes you pine for a _classical_ education == fall-of-eve

Ava: 10: magical. I'm particularly charmed by the subtle high church metaphors running throughout. == tea-afternoon

Moderator: 10: Leonard Cohen and mindgames: a recipe for fun! == this-is-test

Michael: 10: Iiiiiiiiiiiiiinteresting. Perfect writing, just not your typical erotica. :) == neat-nails

Ava: 10: Hot Yeti love! == assassin

Moderator: 10: flawless -- should satisfy even the most jaded readers == envelope

Moderator: 10: exquisitely crafted and researched. Not for the squeamish, though. == bridal

Moderator: 10: excellent, vivid images; strong voice; subtle == garlic

Ava: 10: Elegant and delightful. == la-princesa

Moderator: 10: curious title, elegant story. With some proofreading, IMHO this is publishable. == whats-chicken

Moderator: 10: been there, done that, it was _exactly_ like this... == kael.8.94-1

Moderator: 10: astounding and inventive worldbuilding; "Desire Amongst The Clone Tanks" == gene-engineer

Ava: 10: AP Calculus was *never* like this! == neat-nails

X-Ava-Review: 10: another fine historical piece from Ashbee == bridal

Moderator: 10: an honest cu^Homing-of-age story about friends == tomboy

Michael: 10: A wonderful, entertaining speculative short story that just happens to include explicit sex. Bravo. One of the best stories I've reviewed. == heat-dmb

Michael: 10: a modern piece this time, still wonderful as ever. == tea-afternoon

Ava: 10: a Grendel-Khan story where nobody dies -- and it's still hot! == this-is-test

Moderator: 10: _Wow_. == heldar

Moderator: 10: Hot sex, good writing, and digs at the religious right. I Approve. == strange-bedf

Moderator: 10: A perfect genre piece == gracie-adv.1

Ava: 10: scrumdidillyumptious, or something... == yng-painter

Ava: 10: reads a bit like gothic Harlan Ellison, and that's high praise from me. == conversation

Ava: 10: original, well written, funny, and _hot_ == twice-kaja

Ava: 10: lovely. Nice to see good poetry, for a change. == echoes-ii

Ava: 10: an explicit O. Henry story == strange-bedf

Ava: 10: Robert Service and Dr. Seuss get drunk in Callahan's Crosstime Saloon == poem-tragic

Ava: 10: Oh, baby! Deconstruct me! Harder! Now! == gracie-adv.1

Ava: 10: Eli my liege-lord : lief I would linger / Silent by == heldar

Ava: 10: Ashbee turns her sure hand to body mod sf == gene-engineer

Ava: 10: AOL! == phoebe-sunday.03

Ava: 10: AOL! == phoebe-sunday.02

Michael: 10: _La Femme Connita_. ROTFL. == assassin

Ava: 10: "When you're lovers in a dangerous time / Sometimes you're made to feel as if your love's a crime..." Lovely little piece. == whats-chicken

Ava: 10: "Her Perseus linger and leave her to extremes". _Lovely._ == chaining-andr

Moderator: 9: you know, it's harder to come up with snappy patter for _good_ stories. Not that I'm complaining... == phoebe-sunday.03

Moderator: 9: well-concluded == screams.7

Moderator: 9: very, very twisted == wife4to6

Ava: 9: Utterly charming; convincing characters and dialogue, and a telling attention to detail. The Califia reference is a nice touch, too. ;) == klk-firsttime

Moderator: 9: uses some marvelous devices; excellent visualization == aphatos

Moderator: 9: this is hilarious == beauty-n-priest

Moderator: 9: the most original pick-up I've come across... == sweet-sarah

Ava: 9: Sweet and reflective. Doesn't _every_ girl need a daddy sometimes? == the-pursuit

Ava: 9: Striking central conceit, handled much more skillfully than the average erotic fare. I want to see more... == brother-sun

Michael: 9: Somewhat sappily romantic, but a strong, powerful voice, and a charming concept. Bravo. == brother-sun

Moderator: 9: something for everyone here: love, sex, and writing == roadtrip

Moderator: 9: solid character development, good flow, real dialogue == kael.12.89

Moderator: 9: simply wonderful. Even better than the prequel. == twice-kaja

Moderator: 9: real == phoebe-sunday.02

Moderator: 9: paging Falcon Video, we have your new screenwriter... == camping-story

Moderator: 9: overly disaffected at times but memorably punchy == pink-neon-preq

Michael: 9: Not strictly erotica, but excellently written nonetheless. == the-pursuit

Moderator: 9: low sexual content but breathtaking in parts == pool-night.3

Ava: 9: Literate and lyrical. The only real flaws could be fixed by a run through a spellchecker. == tricia

Ava: 9: International erotica makes my reading more delightful! == black-magic

Michael: 9: Inexplicably charming and fun. == black-magic

Michael: 9: I'm not at all qualified to critique poetry, but I like this a great deal. == deirde-mirror

Michael: 9: Hot and incredibly sweet. One wonders how based in reality it is... ;) == capturing-the-rush

Michael: 9: Hey babe, take a walk on the wolf side... == jahn-lrrh

Moderator: 9: harrowing; low on sex but fascinating == lady+trucker

Moderator: 9: good dialogue, intriguing concept == snapshots

Moderator: 9: excellent voice == echoes-ii

Moderator: 9: excellent mood, economic dialogue == pink-neon-fish

Moderator: 9: excellent continuation, logically consistent == screams.6

Ava: 9: disturbing but well written; reads like free verse == cynthia.1

Moderator: 9: continuing character development == screams.4

Moderator: 9: clever, adroitly written == going-away

X-Ava-Review: 9: beautiful, poetic little vignette. Read this, and support public transportation. == soft-trains

Moderator: 9: an odd and wonderful sort of fairy tale == eli-enigma

Moderator: 9: absolutely charming. Sequel! Sequel! == business-obj

Michael: 9: A wonderful, perfectly written story. Conventional BDSM, but so well crafted that it doesn't matter. == klk-firsttime

Moderator: 9: a steely Lolita tale; insistent, measured voice == carillon

Ava: 9: a camera ad campaign from a more enlightened world == snapshots

Michael: 9: A bit cliched in places, but otherwise _very_ good. == tricia

Moderator: 9: _extremely_ disturbing and well crafted == conversation

Moderator: 9: Somewhere between Nine Inch Nails and The Afghan Whigs == silence

Moderator: 9: A curious mix of "The Catbird Seat" and SB's "Let's Talk About Sex". Very creative. == ukes-phone-story

Moderator: 9: "The BOFH gets laid!" _Far_ too much of this reads like my life... == eli-may

Moderator: 9: "I'm _very_ disappointed in you..." <whip crack> <sizzle> == bburg-fant.3

Moderator: 9: intense == deep-deprivation

Ava: 9: the most original take I've seen on phone / cyber sex == ukes-phone-story

Ava: 9: series continues to ring true == phoebe-sunday.01

Ava: 9: a kinky email version of _Griffin and Sabine_. Well == correspondence

Ava: 9: X-rated _Aeon Flux_ == gyrotron

Ava: 9: Hopkins-esque turns of phrase enliven a startlingly mild Eli story == eli-may

Ava: 9: Eli ventures into Tanith Lee territory == eli-enigma

Ava: 9: *Serious* PDA. More realistic characters from Kael. == kael.8.94-1

Ava: 9: "We don-a like *nothing* soft! We like ever'thing *hard*!" MUCH better than its inspiration... == stencholust

Ava: 9: "Nothing is slower than limping days / When under the heavy weather of the years / Boredom, the fruit of glum indifference, / Gains the dimension of eternity..." == silence

Ava: 9: "...and I don't handle disappointment _well_." _Excellent_ topping, and I don't mean Cool Whip. == bburg-fant.3

Ava: 8: you tease! By all means, persevere. == blindfold

Moderator: 8: very nice == last.night

Moderator: 8: very elegantly done, strong characters == hs-dare

Moderator: 8: the only blemish is the lack of accurate punctuation == soft-trains

Moderator: 8: survey sez: keep on going :) == blindfold

Moderator: 8: subtle == green

Ava: 8: strong visual descriptions. Quite well done. == two-by-two

Michael: 8: Stream of consciousness, but startlingly honest and sweet == from-the-files

Michael: 8: Some of the deliberate cultural references are forced, but otherwise _very_ promising. == the-inspiration

Moderator: 8: short but deft voyeuristic tale == curved-svc

Moderator: 8: quoth the reviewer, "whoa" == alc.husband3

Moderator: 8: psychological themes == screams.2

Ava: 8: picturesque little vignette == cold

Moderator: 8: once again, the story rings true == phoebe.02

Moderator: 8: old concept, but realistic and well done == gone

Moderator: 8: novel, smooth delivery, amusing concepts == supergirl

Michael: 8: Not at all what I expect from Eli, but by now I should know not to assume anything about his stories. :) == eli-special

Moderator: 8: moves too fast in places, but very thoughtful == totem-pole

Ava: 8: More perfect edgy first-person narrative. == more-therapy

Moderator: 8: meaty, decisive prose; relatively few stale points == headbanger

Ava: 8: Marvelously unsettling. == ongoing-therapy

X-Ava-Review: 8: Kael Goodman meets the Holy Virgin Mary == kael.9.83-1

Moderator: 8: intense == alc.husband4

Ava: 8: I am. Lovely. == deirde-mirror

Ava: 8: Hot-hot bear-bear sex-sex! (And very sweet, too...) == capturing-the-rush

Moderator: 8: honest, more real than most == phoebe.01

Moderator: 8: he doesn't learn, does he? == phoebe-sunday.01

Moderator: 8: has the feel of historical accuracy, and good writing == al-fresco

Moderator: 8: great narrative, some fascinating transitions == feather

X-Ava-Review: 8: Genuinely yummy == (jahn-personal)

Ava: 8: Gee, where were these people when *I* was in Girl Scout camp... == mfa-stareyes

X-Ava-Review: 8: Empire costume drama. Yummy. == al-fresco

Ava: 8: Eli shows his sensitive side, and it can write too! Damn! == eli-special

Moderator: 8: dynamic setup, very powerful touches == bachelorette

Moderator: 8: consistently powerful voice == screams.5

X-Ava-Review: 8: Charmingly circular story hour == abandonment

Moderator: 8: charming and funny == last-night

Moderator: 8: been there, done that, got the friction burns == kael.9.83-1

Moderator: 8: beautiful imagery, clever twists == moon

Moderator: 8: baba shaga hey baby can you dig it? == cynthia.1

Moderator: 8: as usual, a very pretty tale == LG-desire

Michael: 8: An understated but intriguing short piece. == mfa-coffee

Moderator: 8: amusing concept, excellent virtual topping == correspondence

X-Ava-Review: 8: adorable; "When Harry Met Harry". Not long enough, though! == business-obj

Moderator: 8: absolutely intriguing == wife1to3

Moderator: 8: a prime example of the fact that good erotica does not necessarily require graphic fucking == massage

Moderator: 8: a page from the personal diary of General Jack D. Ripper... == stencholust

Moderator: 8: I'm a sucker for good characters == kael.12.89-2

Moderator: 8: I wish I could say I understand what she's doing here... == shower-of-gold

Moderator: 8: I know all I need to know about the Crying Game... == dressed-up

Moderator: 8: Edgar Rice Burroughs' _Pulp Friction_, or _Space: 6969_ == joan-carter.01

Moderator: 8: Bruce LaBruce's original script for _Goldeneye_ == gyrotron

Ava: 8: _Boys In The Sand_, revisited == men-at-the-beach

Ava: 8: "Nice boots..." == the-pursuit

Moderator: 8: "I was flying into / Chicago at night / watching the lake turn the sky / into blue-green smoke" == old-friends

Ava: 8: would have been more erotic if it was shorter, but atmospheric and well written == chance-enc

Ava: 8: intriguing premise, nice reversal of typical age and gender roles == phoebe.01

Ava: 8: flashes of beat poetry == green

Ava: 8: charming. Continues to hold my interest. == phoebe.02

Ava: 8: a sweet, if poorly-paragraphed gay male coming-of-age story == camping-story

Ava: 8: _Rashomon_ meets Greek myth. But wasn't Athene Zeus' daughter... == shower-of-gold

Ava: 8: _Peyton Place_ revisited == gone

Ava: 8: _Hogan's Heroes_ was never like this == last-night

Ava: 8: Yet another taste of cheap delights. I feel like I know these folks. == kael.12.89

Ava: 8: Stern Enema Nurse stream-of-consciousness == love-in-morning

Ava: 8: No, it's ERB's _A Porn Star of Mars_! == joan-carter.01

Ava: 8: Mmmmmmmm. A little to the left. Higher. AAaahhhh. == massage

Ava: 8: Is it soup yet? == dressed-up

Ava: 8: Eli visits Nabokov Land! == teachers-pet

Ava: 8: Another charming piece from Slaytanic == trust-science

Ava: 8: An old story, retold well == old-friends

Moderator: 7: ze voman es eeeeee-vul, ja == comp-yours-i.02

Ava: 7: writing needs some work, but cute == comp-yours-i.01

X-Ava-Review: 7: writing needs some work, but cute == comp-yours-i.01

Michael: 7: Writes from the pathological POV as if he knows. "Delia's gone / one more time / Delia's gone..." == ongoing-therapy

Moderator: 7: very accessible; moves in unexpected directions == boardwalk.1

Ava: 7: Unoriginal premise, but sweetly handled... Somewhat like an adult Mentos! commercial... == bandguy.1

Moderator: 7: the sex may be typical, but the story is not == penelope

Moderator: 7: that's it? you're just gonna leave us hanging? == alc.husband7

Michael: 7: Sweet. Campout story time for big girls... == mfa-stareyes

Moderator: 7: sweet, sad; carried out well == reunion-kateri

Moderator: 7: strong voice, very clean == time-come

Moderator: 7: strong development if a little fast; some weak dialogue == passionchild

Moderator: 7: still not my cuppa but fine writing. == eau-de-soir.1b

Moderator: 7: still good, == superego2

Michael: 7: Somewhat of a cliche by this point, but sweet and true enough to life. == bandguy.1

Moderator: 7: some moments of remarkable subtlety, but still confusing == pool-night.2

Moderator: 7: snicker == limerick2

Moderator: 7: slacker sex, but not badly done == day-at-pool

Moderator: 7: short on tension, characterization; solid plot and sex == charly.2

Moderator: 7: short on tension, characterization; solid plot and sex == charly.1

Moderator: 7: really strong beginning == screams.1

Moderator: 7: reads like the stage directions from a _Night Trips_ vig == two-by-two

Moderator: 7: playful, romantic == long-drive

Moderator: 7: playful == trust

Moderator: 7: patience is a virtue, right? == whore-n-capt.pt1

Moderator: 7: pathological == teachers-pet

Ava: 7: Out of the closet, into the TV room... (Ellen? Is that you?) == cabled

Michael: 7: On the other hand, I hear the black market Mexican doctors can hook you up with medical grade Spanish Fly real easy... == got-huge-tits

Moderator: 7: ok, I'm on the edge of my seat :) == alc.husband1

Moderator: 7: not an original concept, but well crafted == the-cruise

Moderator: 7: not amazing, but _very_ diabolical == comp-yours-i.03

Ava: 7: No man, you want _helium_ implants, helium! == got-huge-tits

Moderator: 7: no deep truths, but clearly written, fun scenario == callroom

Moderator: 7: neat == habits

Moderator: 7: low erotic element, mixed ending; otherwise excellent == age-old-ritual

Moderator: 7: just sex, but still fairly hot. He loses a point for the == sheer-ecstasy

Moderator: 7: intriguing short fiction; reads like French new wave cin == cold

Moderator: 7: interplay between people is a good thing == alc.husband6

Moderator: 7: interesting, sorta different even == around-for-kaja

Moderator: 7: interesting plotline with good non-sex sections == superego1

Ava: 7: hey! I was going to call it diabolical! == comp-yours-i.03

Michael: 7: Hackneyed ending, but otherwise quite fun. == daylight-dreaming

Moderator: 7: good voice, strong descriptions == sound-barrier

Moderator: 7: good to the last drop ;) == superego3

Moderator: 7: good interplay; plot carries itself well == nice-guys

Moderator: 7: good interplay but where are we going? == kael.12.89-3

Moderator: 7: fuck the prime directive, full speed ahead == whore-n-capt.pt3

Ava: 7: Fresh and witty take on an old theme. And nary a horse culture in sight. == hooked-and-gaffed

Moderator: 7: Foreplay is not a lost art to some, it seems == abandonment

Moderator: 7: flawed, but rings very true. Goes on too long. == chance-enc

Moderator: 7: finely written == carlisletrain

Michael: 7: Extended first person narratives are awkward, and this is a moderate example of the psychological m-dom genre, but still strong == the-intruder

Michael: 7: Disturbing, yet continually intriguing. == more-therapy

Moderator: 7: cute; long lines don't work, though == my-fantasy

Ava: 7: Cute, but an obvious fantasy. I mean, really: a women's room in a mall with no line outside? == daylight-dreaming

X-Ava-Review: 7: charming, but why do I get the image of Felix Unger as drawn by Tom of Finland? == uniform-clete.2

Ava: 7: Charming vignette. == mfa-coffee

Moderator: 7: carefully paced == holiday

Ava: 7: Awkward and overwritten in passages, but shows definite potential. == the-inspiration

X-Ava-Review: 7: Antioch College grad goes to Irish sex party! == the-party

Moderator: 7: angst baby angst (grossish) == 3deserts

Moderator: 7: and? and? :) == alc.husband2

Moderator: 7: amusing romp == working-late

Moderator: 7: always nice to see a new story idea == hiccups

Moderator: 7: Reads like the "Beauty" books. Admirable, though limited. == princess-i.4

Moderator: 7: Overall, not a bad series. Most SF based writing we get is poor, but this has plot, character development, and the sex is spaced well. Better than most fanzine writing. == princess-i.6-2

Moderator: 7: I think the word is "awww" == reading-mail

Michael: 7: All I got for _my_ $65 was 57 lousy channels... == cabled

Ava: 7: a touch overwritten, but evocative. And good taste in fragranc == fluids

Moderator: 7: A bit choppy on the characters, and we all know that net.personals aren't THAT perfect. But a well appreciated effort nonetheless. == (jahn-personal)

Michael: 7: A better than average variation on a theme == stake-out

Michael: 7: _Goths In Space!_, but surprisingly, it works... == the-pursuit

Ava: 7: "Please, B'rer Fox, don't use those titclamps on me!" == comp-yours-i.02

Michael: 7: "Just" sex, but interestingly formal, well-written, and hot. == men-at-the-beach

Moderator: 7: "Just sex", but great realistic dialogue and writing == trust-science

Moderator: 7 == kael.12.89-1

Ava: 7: too sweet for my taste, but romance fans should love it == kate-and-me

Ava: 7: thIss iz THe *LIZZaRd* speeKIng,./ w0mmaN iss k00l!!@! STRanjEr! fUccK! *PiZZ/Za*!!!!!! == wood

Ava: 7: personification of the clit was a nice touch == the-cruise

Ava: 7: decent treatment of an old theme. Love the ending. == testing-limits

Ava: 7: cute POV switches, but obvious fiction. When I've gone lingerie shopping with my girlfriends, the dialogue's been more like "Nothing &@$*@(*& fits!" == mary+jessica

Ava: 7: _Heavy_! Going to go read some Pat Califia now... == she-he

Ava: 7: I quibble with the ending if this is C. lupus rather than C. familiaris, but it's suspenseful == chase

Ava: 7: I can't decide whether Image should be played by Harold Lloyd or Harpo Marx... == no-imagination

Ava: 7: Antioch College grad goes to Irish sex party! == the-party

Ava: 7: Anne Rice and John Norman had a kid! == princess-i.4

Ava: 7: Agreed, but is he going to end it here? We don't know how the war turns out or anything... And still no Jack Palance, damnit! == princess-i.6-2

Ava: 6: Yeah, but _still_ no Jack Palance! == princess-i.3

Moderator: 6: whirlwind fantasy, well-paced == never-sleeps

Moderator: 6: weird. == desert

Moderator: 6: very good prose but limited depth in characters/scenes == heyer

Moderator: 6: uncomplicated, decent; some confusing motivations == sleepover

Moderator: 6: tolerable writing offsets the lack of original plot == the-cruise.2

Moderator: 6: this one lulls a bit == alc.husband5

Moderator: 6: this is cute, but the narration feels like it's being done by William Shatner... == wood

Ava: 6: the erotica equivalent of a Grateful Dead jam session: it goes == sheer-ecstasy

Moderator: 6: sweet, a little sappy == miss-you

Moderator: 6: strong voice but wavers into fantasy near the end == blood

Moderator: 6: strong POV and characters; more subtlety would help == blind-faith

Moderator: 6: strong moments but altogether unremarkable == moonstruck

Moderator: 6: story is nice, writing has flaws == toku.teasing

Ava: 6: Still better than the opening chapters, but amateur when compared to, say, _The Calyx of Isis_. == conquering-texas.4

Michael: 6: Something of a throwaway, but well-structured. == the-pursuit

Moderator: 6: some soap-opera techniques but strong characters == lynn

Ava: 6: So what *else* does a bear do in the woods? <rimshot> == north-country

Ava: 6: Sling building, tonight on _This Old Dungeon_ == conquering-texas.2

Moderator: 6: sex isn't bad, but it's unclear how Jessica seems to know exactly what Mary is thinking. Maybe she really is a goddess... == mary+jessica

Moderator: 6: sets a good mood, though doesn't go far == hisjob.tls

Ava: 6: Serviceable, if uninspired, mild B/D == first-time-at-play.2

Ava: 6: ritualistic; bit too long == moonlove

Moderator: 6: reasonable sex, tender, sweet == lush-fantasy

Moderator: 6: pretty, short == certain.smile

Moderator: 6: pretty good == jerrys-intro

Moderator: 6: overly long, poor dialogue, but structured well == the-party

Moderator: 6: oddly sweet, even for such a simple and direct voice == best-friends

Michael: 6: Not your standard sex-n-horror tale. A bit cheesy, but still quite fun. == hooked-and-gaffed

Moderator: 6: not what you're expecting... == chase

Moderator: 6: not my cuppa, but written well == eau-de-soir.1a

Moderator: 6: not much here but sex, but that is well done == in-dark

Moderator: 6: not badly written for fetish porn == living-large

Moderator: 6: not astounding, but quite serviceable == testing-limits

Moderator: 6: not a tv/tg/ts story, but the title is apropos... == she-he

Moderator: 6: no Greater Truths to be found, but pleasant, lustful == dryad

Moderator: 6: needs some touchups, but head and shoulders above the crowd == in-the-meadow

Ava: 6: needs some revision, but sweet == living-large

Moderator: 6: needs some fleshing out, but fairly hot == sat-night

Moderator: 6: more lightweight pleasantries == dinner-time

Moderator: 6: made me giggle == no-imagination

Moderator: 6: low on sex; imperative tone, strong characters == obj-hs

Ava: 6: Keg party at Alpha Alpha Gor! == princess-i.6-1

Moderator: 6: It appears he's heard of plot development... == princess-i.3

Moderator: 6: is not my cuppa, but will be others... == jerry-visit1

Moderator: 6: interesting, but confusing language and setting == storm-moor

Moderator: 6: interesting concept, but takes more pleasure in describing the tech than in the sex == kafka-dreams

Moderator: 6: interesting but very vague, hard to follow == swirling

Moderator: 6: inexpert but comfortable writing == exercise-bike

Moderator: 6: imagine King Missile performing one of Ginsberg's poems == love-in-morning

Moderator: 6: good plot but simplistic characters == vamps.2

Moderator: 6: good plot but simplistic characters == vamps.1

Moderator: 6: fair but some jarring wordings == homework-dulc

Moderator: 6: difficult to follow, but clever dialogue == pigeons

Moderator: 6: cute and truthful == uniform-clete.2

Moderator: 6: curious, but interesting. Almost beat poetry. == running

Moderator: 6: conventional, but cruel and creative == comp-yours-i.01

Moderator: 6: Continues to be an interesting series == princess-i.6-1

Moderator: 6: confusing narrative but otherwise fair == only-1-way

Moderator: 6: cleanly written for the most part, but it drags on == moonlove

Moderator: 6: bizarre; like a porn DO THE RIGHT THING == boardwalk.2

Moderator: 6: Better than average == swapnite.2

Moderator: 6: as an introduction, good == debbies-gift.pt1

Moderator: 6: This isn't turning out to be as bad as I expected :) == princess-i.5

Moderator: 6: Story is nice, style could use work == thedate

Moderator: 6: I just can't picture him saying "fuck" == whore-n-capt.pt2

Moderator: 6: Competent, but not astounding == princess-i.2

Moderator: 6: As a humor story it's pretty good. == geeksex2.txt

Moderator: 6: amusing, clever; a touch of editing would help == fleeing-gods

Moderator: 6: amusing, but a little limited == oobat

Moderator: 6: air of detachment, but deeply involved details == waters-edge

Ava: 6: A tad cliched, but not bad == swapnite.2

Ava: 6: A startling new ad campaign for elevator shoes. == a-strangers-touch

Moderator: 6: a little heart-on-sleeve, but very honest and charming == kris

Moderator: 6: a little haunting == MakingAmends

Moderator: 6: a bit heavy-handed, but leaves a warm glow == fluids

Ava: 6: "We have a special room prepared for you, Mr. Berry" == motel-man.1

Moderator: 6: sad == damya.goodbye

Moderator: 6: not bad, but writing has some flaws == toku.evening

Ava: 6: the ending is every writing teacher's nightmare, but it's rather charming in its own right. == day-at-pool

Ava: 6: standard mf oral (yawn) == the-cruise.2

Ava: 6: interesting style marred by some humorous spelling errors == my-fantasy

Ava: 6: fans of Califia's SF erotica should read this == kafka-dreams

Ava: 6: been there, done that, got the t-shirt. Reads like a first draft, unfortunately. And I wasn't _that_ old. == roger+claire

Ava: 6: _T.J. Hooker_ was never this hot == uniform-clete.1

Ava: 6: So far, so good. But I kind of want to see Jack Palance in a later episode... == princess-i.1

Ava: 6: Kids, can you spot the error in the first two sentences? == a-struggler

Ava: 6: Just plain sex, but well done == lost+found

Ava: 6: Independent Contractors of Gor, and the Slave Girls Who Love Them == princess-i.2

Ava: 6: Happiness in Slavery == princess-i.5

Ava: 6: Gives a new connotation to 'seafood diet' == psycho-clam-1

Ava: 6: Fascinating like a train wreck. Makes _The Story of O_ look like a Sunday school picnic. == androgenous

Ava: 6: 70's swing club nostalgia == swapnite.1

Ava: 6: "Topping from the bottom" taken to a funny extreme == dear-sir-stephen

Moderator: 6: "Severine, what are you thinking about?" == a-struggler

Ava: 6: "Salad fixings or sex toy?", as a friend once said == in-the-meadow

Moderator: 5: well written, novel theme, but odd non sequiturs == feet-first

Moderator: 5: very strange. == failed.messiahs

Ava: 5: Using such florid prose to pad out a bland BDSM story is most illogical, Captain. == long-long-last

Ava: 5: Unremarkable but cute. == mfa-tanya

Moderator: 5: too much dialogue lifted from _Dune_ == dagger-rel.01

X-Ava-Review: 5: This episode, a special tribute to the Fuggs == motel-man.2

Ava: 5: Terse but tolerable writing. But does the second part actually reveal the point of this story? == la-princesa

Michael: 5: Surprisingly good for freeform verse, but would be much better as prose. == la-princesa

Michael: 5: Strictly average. And who the hell is Texas? == conquering-texas.4

Moderator: 5: story isn't bad but formatting is == roissy3A

Michael: 5: Spock! Too much. Excess. Verbiage! == long-long-last

Moderator: 5: so-so; poorly paced == quiet-watch

Moderator: 5: skillful narrative, some strong moments; still personal == meeting.3

Moderator: 5: short and palatable, some corny lines == midn-movie

Michael: 5: She's awful gymnastic with a recently-sprained ankle and after a month of hiking through the Yukon. Sweet nonetheless. == north-country

Moderator: 5: seen worse, seen better == roissy3B

Ava: 5: Real sex radicals do this kinda thing in cubicles! == under-the-desk

Michael: 5: reads too much like 'A Lady Like Lauren'; at least the woman in this one isn't a cardboard cutout. == call-it-even

Moderator: 5: quiet, romantic == massage+

Michael: 5: Pretty standard office-sex fantasy. Good thing he has a private office, though. == under-the-desk

Moderator: 5: pretty introductory with this piece == changes.1

Moderator: 5: pleasant; uninvolved == birthday-dulc

Moderator: 5: pleasant, straightforward, amusing == down-by-tracks

Michael: 5: Perfectly average, first-person narrative. == mfa-tanya

Moderator: 5: passable == seduc-dulc

Moderator: 5: ow ow ow ow ow ow ow == v-severed

Moderator: 5: original scenario == bike-riding

Moderator: 5: ordinary == break-time

Moderator: 5: okay == spill

Moderator: 5: not my style. == desc.woman.mast

Moderator: 5: not credible, but some very hot sex == dressing-rm

Moderator: 5: not bad, not gripping == mysterious.ms

Moderator: 5: nice, ordinary, unassuming == summer-memory

Michael: 5: Nice, but... *shrug* Perfectly average. == first-time-at-play.2

Moderator: 5: nice images, nice structure, but lacking otherwise == parched.p

Moderator: 5: moving along == changes.3

Moderator: 5: mildly humorous, quiet interlude == ice-cream

Michael: 5: Middling, but shows promise. == a-strangers-touch

Ava: 5: Man, I'd hate to be working tech support for these things. == vr-suit-i

Michael: 5: Love among the Golden Arches. :) Needs a spellcheck, but still fun == new-job

Moderator: 5: lightweight but pleasant; strong Harlequin-novel tone == harvest-moon

Ava: 5: Let's hope "Teledildonics" isn't a subsidiary of Acme Products, Inc., or this is gonna have a really messy ending... *meep meep* == vr-suit-iii

Michael: 5: Language shows promise and intriguing character lead-in, but drags on too long, and naughty-wife cliche is tired == lady-like-lauren

Ava: 5: It's always the quiet ones... == the-pursuit

Moderator: 5: it's . . . nice. == bath-and-incense

Moderator: 5: intriguing but terribly confusing == reincar.p

Moderator: 5: interesting, needs development == motel-man.1

Moderator: 5: interesting beginning but must work to show promise == kissmet

Michael: 5: has potential. == midnight-swim

Michael: 5: has definite promise, needs rewrite == thanksgiving

Ava: 5: H1 MY N@M3 IZ B1FF @ND 1 JU3T G0T TH13 K001 SU1T R U M 0R F!!!!!1111!!!!1!! == vr-suit-ii

Moderator: 5: good style, though standard plot == eloise-preq

Moderator: 5: good narrative voice, but abbreviated == LG-dance

Moderator: 5: good but conventional == lunchtime

Moderator: 5: formatting lowers the quality a bit == roissy3C

Moderator: 5: fair but again very terse == next-morn

Moderator: 5: etc. == morning-dulc

Moderator: 5: entertaining == giftwrap

Moderator: 5: email romance leads to fairly typical hetsex == the-storm

Moderator: 5: cute but lightweight == just-news

Ava: 5: competent, but unremarkable. == midnight-swim

Moderator: 5: charming; needs a good editor, though. Older woman, younger man, etc. == roger+claire

Moderator: 5: charming, but you see it coming a mile off == found-out

Moderator: 5: charming but uncomplicated, unenlightening == catharsis

Moderator: 5: charming == uniform-clete.1

Michael: 5: An interesting take on pseudo-incest and age-difference relationships == stepmother

Moderator: 5: amusing == dear-sir-stephen

Moderator: 5: almost campy, in a geek milieu == comp-fun

Moderator: 5: again, sorta ruined by the bad formatting == roissy3D

Moderator: 5: actually some interesting characters here == thula.2

Michael: 5: Above average; again, just needs editing. I'd like to see load bearing diagrams for that sling-in-bed contraption, though... == conquering-texas.2

Moderator: 5: above average dialogue, averageish story == dining-out

Moderator: 5: Tolerably written, but turns me off... A bit cheesy. == swapnite.1

Moderator: 5: Solid, but not exceptional. I'd be happy if stories like this were the baseline of the submissions. == lost+found

Moderator: 5: Ozzie and Harriet as done by Nancy Friday == didnt-expect

Moderator: 5: Old story but at least written well == parkingtickets

Moderator: 5: Middle of the road. I'm not big on Gor, but the writing's tolerable, and the sex isn't that stupid... == princess-i.1

Moderator: 5: Jello Biafra, this one's for you. == private-eyes

Moderator: 5: I was expecting something different from someone called "the BEAR"... == kate-and-me

Moderator: 5: Geez. Some people are really strict about sharing their toys... == dale-caro.1

Moderator: 5 == taken-poem

Moderator: 5 == plum

Moderator: 5 == 041495-poem

Moderator: 5: nothing particularly special == 3scompany

Ava: 5: unicorns who hate women, and the women who love them, next on Ricki Lake == hunt-unicorn

Ava: 5: this one's for all the Harlequin fans == the-storm

Ava: 5: that's GOTTA hurt == v-severed

Ava: 5: sweet. You get Brownie points for the safe sex plug. == didnt-expect

Ava: 5: still too prolix, but nothing a little judicious editing couldn't fix == turn-about

Ava: 5: not my fetish, but tolerable first person narrative == steps-of-moma

Ava: 5: maybe it's the accent, but b&d has never seemed so kyuute! == dutch-game

Ava: 5: interesting style, too short to get point across. Or was there a point? == running

Ava: 5: good-hearted, if a touch cliched == found-out

Ava: 5: don't ruin the surprise ending for your friends! == private-eyes

Ava: 5: You know, this would be a good double bill with _Twilight of the Cockroaches_... == psycho-clam-3

Ava: 5: Now don't you wish you'd listened to me, and created that 'eli' keyword? == psycho-clam-2

Ava: 5: I know! Imagine if she'd been playing with his Lego set... == dale-caro.1

Ava: 5: A touch cliched, but grows on you (high praise if you know my feelings about free verse). == la-princesa

Moderator: 5: a fitting sequel == her-turn

Ava: 5: _Ferris Bueller_ meets _The Craft_ == black-magic

Michael: 5: "Are you a good spirit, or a *bad* spirit?" == black-magic

Ava: 5: "And then another ant came and took away another piece of corn..." Sometimes, you need to know what to leave out. == ladies-first

Ava: 5: "And my neck shall pay for all, when I'm gone..." == day-i-hang

Moderator: 4: writing is poor but the sex is decent == hermes

Moderator: 4: much schlock material, but reasonable sex scenes == atolls.1

Moderator: 4: would rather be reading Joel Furr == holy-days

Moderator: 4: when good SCAdians write bad erotica == hunt-unicorn

Moderator: 4: wastes little time and even less punctuation == valentine-day

Moderator: 4: very heart-on-sleeve == digital-sw

Moderator: 4: unsurprising, unsubtle == vicky

Moderator: 4: uneven emphasis, detached voice == changes.2

Moderator: 4: um, I don't know... == julia-n-ryan

Moderator: 4: thin set-up, weak follow-through == toolbelt

Michael: 4: The first paragraph was promising, but the rest reads like a middling entry in a Hemingway imitators contest. == la-princesa

Moderator: 4: sweet but pointless == dawns-coming

Moderator: 4: still unexceptional, though Wyatt Earp reference wins == perv-mark.2

Moderator: 4: standard ff sex fare, watersports fetishists may like it == steps-of-moma

Moderator: 4: standard best-friend's-mother tale == hope+greg

Moderator: 4: Sorry, no biscuit this time. Too far out. == motel-man.2

Moderator: 4: some tense problems, but the story adapts well to them == thxgiving

Michael: 4: Shrug. == cotton-dresses

Michael: 4: Shortly afterwards, the suits were banned by the FCC... == vr-suit-iii

Moderator: 4: short, ambiguous in all the wrong ways == fant-fulfill

Moderator: 4: shifting verb tenses are _not_ erotic. Needs work. == field-of-dreams

Moderator: 4: same old same old == chair

Michael: 4: Paragraphs are fun-for-mentals. == jaime.01

Moderator: 4: one-dimensional == lisa+rex

Moderator: 4: not much more interesting == witness-2

Moderator: 4: saccharine == home

Moderator: 4: s-l-o-o-o-w == friend-lover.03

Moderator: 4: pretentious, but sexy; heavily cliched == smoke-sworls

Moderator: 4: open-ended prose, some overused cliches and idioms == ThndrStallion

Moderator: 4: not really persuasive == darknites-magic

Moderator: 4: no real focus here, peculiar premonitional voice == pool-night.1

Moderator: 4: narrative needs direction and a good editor == friend-lover.01

Michael: 4: Mostly sex and no expedition, but still enjoyable == roundup

Moderator: 4: might be improved with character names, etc. == welc-home

Moderator: 4: little empathy involved, no clear focus == meeting.1

Moderator: 4: like X-rated Hallmark propaganda == box

Moderator: 4: Like Kool-Aid for chocolate == fantasy

Moderator: 4: lifeless == perv-mark.1

Ava: 4: Katherine Kerr writes porn == dagger-rel.01

Moderator: 4: indelicate == unreality.p

Michael: 4: Ho-hum "hot girl-girl action". At least the author can spell and format competently. == bitch-and-me

Ava: 4: Heheheheheh. Beavis, you type real good. Heheheheheh. == jaime.01

Ava: 4: good concept, but it needs work == dawns-coming

Moderator: 4: furious energy of scene not really evoked by writing == desktop

Moderator: 4: fairly limp, so to speak == surprise

Moderator: 4: excruciatingly long and overdetailed. We don't need GPS readings on his tongue every three seconds, thank you... == ladies-first

Moderator: 4: cute; die-hard GWTW fans might not be amused == gwtw

Moderator: 4: could use a few more active verbs == hands

Moderator: 4: corny plot, unsurprising == rescue

Moderator: 4: cheerful, a little lacking in substance == ifonly

Moderator: 4: but what's it *about*? == consent-voyeur

Moderator: 4: blow-by-blow commentary, and I do mean that... == turn-about

Moderator: 4: bad dialogue == rain

Moderator: 4: Rambling style makes this distracting == nudestang1

Moderator: 4: One wonders where Eli gets his insights into mollusc sex == psycho-clam-2

Moderator: 4: If you're shooting for the really low reviews, you have to make them (a) badlee mispelt, and (b) not quite so funny. == psycho-clam-3

Ava: 4: Aimless vignette == fantasy

Ava: 4: *yawn* Strictly for catfight fetishists. == bitch-and-me

Moderator: 4: *yawn* == dkroom.fantasy

Ava: 4: total PVC fetish territory == hydrocarbon

Ava: 4: sure, the characters are in medicine, but it's all so ... clinical. == angel-of-mercy

Ava: 4: preggie fetish turns me OFF, but the style is interesting == mine

Ava: 4: inconsistent verb tenses give me a headache == friend-lover.01

Ava: 4: ho-hum SCAdian sex == field-of-dreams

Ava: 4: explicit Richard Bach == kiss+make-up

Ava: 4: either he's very well trained, or this is the softest b&d I've ever seen == home

Ava: 4: better written than the usual "b&d with net.friends". Finish the story, clit tease! == open-stranger

Ava: 4: better written than his last submission == firsts

Ava: 4: Kafka visits Brobdingnab == metamensity

Ava: 4: I was waiting for the denouement to be straight from "The Pina Colada Song" == dreaming-net

Ava: 4: Don't you just hate it when the Reagans' go out drinking? == nancy-night

Ava: 4: Aw! I wanna see the snuff story! But prudish octopi ... must show you some Japanese erotica sometime. == psycho-clam-4

Ava: 4: "I can bring home the bacon / Fry it up in a pan / And never, ever let you forget that this needs revision..." == friend-lover.02

Moderator: 3: yadda yadda yadda == joseph1

Moderator: 3: working 'stiff' makes good == chauffeur

Ava: 3: Well... Um... The grammar's okay. On the other hand, the story's pretty pointless. == i-am-rapist

Ava: 3: Well, at least the author didn't illustrate it with ASCII art... == unnamed-odin.1

Ava: 3: Well, at least he didn't vector the "Jamie Lee Curtis is a man" UL... == mmob.2

Moderator: 3: weak writing, standard plot == train-adv

Moderator: 3: very much an "inside" story; distracting narrative == meeting.2

Moderator: 3: uninspiring == mine

Moderator: 3: unclear whether the rhythm is accidental or deliberate == lietome.p

Ava: 3: um, well ... the punctuation's okay... == susan

Moderator: 3: um, ok. == tiffany.spring

Moderator: 3: um, I don't get it. == flashback

Moderator: 3: too personal to make much sense to a wider audience == soft-love.2

Moderator: 3: the story has potential, if it wasn't hobbled by the author's typing skills == horny

Ava: 3: The pajamas are the most interesting character here. == white-silk-pjs

Ava: 3: That, or it's really wordy text for a _Magic: The Wanking_ card. == untold-story-succubus

Michael: 3: Sure hope they have ActiveX and JavaScript disabled in these things... == vr-suit-ii

Moderator: 3: sure == grandprix

Moderator: 3: strange, unresolved dark undertones == neighbors

Moderator: 3: strains credibility; lacks description == 2s-company

Moderator: 3: starts out promisingly but devolves fast == reading

Moderator: 3: standard == LG-fantasy

Moderator: 3: standard "first time" story with Victorian overlay == eloise

Moderator: 3: slow, sloppy, not quite credible == FirstTimeEnc

Moderator: 3: second-person voice dilutes the passion == encounter-nyc

Moderator: 3: present tense, second-person mode only distracts == soft-love.3

Michael: 3: Mostly competently written juvenalia == mmob.2

Moderator: 3: lifeless, so to speak == red-lips

Moderator: 3: lacks direction == roger

Moderator: 3: kinda ho-hum == damya.mast2

Moderator: 3: juvenile == work-late

Moderator: 3: is she being topped by Jesus? == dutch-game

Ava: 3: I'm feeling seasick, myself == fri-aftrnoon

Michael: 3: I have no review, I just looooove saying "giant throbbing one-eyed menace". == unnamed-odin.1

Moderator: 3: horny net geeks meet and fuck. <sigh> == dreaming-net

Moderator: 3: first-drafty, doesn't go very far == bath-felenzi

Ava: 3: Everything but the gerbil == mmob.2

Michael: 3: Everyone has celebrity fantasies. It's just that some of them shouldn't be written down. == mmob.2

Moderator: 3: even as humor doesn't get far == thula.1

Moderator: 3: erotica or physical exam? You be the judge. == angel-of-mercy

Moderator: 3: detached == spr-cleaning

Moderator: 3: boats put me to sleep, and so did this == fri-aftrnoon

Moderator: 3: They found a parking space in Boston? This _is_ a fantasy. == friend-lover.02

Moderator: 3: If your family that dysfunctional, why are you having dinner with them? == friend-lover.04

Moderator: 3: I can't believe we're having an argument as to whether this is rimming or penetration. == psycho-clam-4

Moderator: 3: Gigantor, Gigantor... == metamensity

Moderator: 3: badly needs rewriting; some genuinely humorous usages == roomview.1

Moderator: 3: amusing but careless writing == word-games

Moderator: 3: Amateur Slut Night at the Roadhouse. (2 inch heels? <snort>) == nancy-night

Michael: 3: _The Silver Spandex Lover_ == vr-suit-i

Ava: 3: _Behind The Green Tent Flap_ == summer-camp

Moderator: 3: "erotica" is not just fucking, kids == firsts

Moderator: 3 == midnite-oil

Ava: 3: why do I get the feeling they're goths who play Scrabble? == smoke-sworls

Ava: 3: nothing turns me on more than a good vampire story. This wasn't it. == vamp.1

Ava: 3: Okay. We've all done the goatee thing. Now, can we all just move along? == primal-rhythm

Ava: 3: Jeff's writing is getting better -- but why does this remind me of _Young Lady Chatterly_? == chauffeur

Ava: 3: If you're going to play anally, play safe, kids. IRL, this woman wouldn't be eating dinner with her folks, she'd be seeing her GYN for an unpleasant vaginal infection. == friend-lover.04

Ava: 3: Didn't Madonna already testify against this guy? == summer

Ava: 3: Coffee Achievers in Heat == fond-memories

Ava: 3: <knock, knock> Is there an ending anywhere around here? == friend-lover.03

Ava: 3: "V: The Lost Years". As always, a bizarre offering from Eli. == crying-baby

Ava: 3: "Pardon me: do you have any Grey Poupon? Or perchance, Astroglide?" == caribb-fant

Ava: 3: "I met a lady in the woods/full beautiful, a faery's child/she said, 'The best my agent can get me is this *@#&$ D&D crap?'" == lady-of-the-keep

Moderator: 2: would rather be reading Serdar Argic == 2-nights

Moderator: 2: witless == toon-sex

Moderator: 2: where's Bela Lugosi when you need him? == chaos.embrace

Ava: 2: What, no plastercasting? == the-roadie

Moderator: 2: very, very soft == soft-love

Michael: 2: Uninspired and pointless; reads like a porn script == cum-girl

Moderator: 2: time to renew my subscription to _Blue_Blood_. Yawn. == vamp.1

Moderator: 2: tame -- for Eli, that is == hydrocarbon

Moderator: 2: some people will do _anything_ to get head in business == slave2desire.1

Moderator: 2: snide tone unbecoming == geeksex.txt

Michael: 2: Reads like AD&D _Ravenloft_ pr0n. Where's her hit points and statistics? Did he get a saving throw? == untold-story-succubus

Moderator: 2: paragraphs are your _friend_ == the-seminar

Moderator: 2: not to my taste, sorry == day-i-hang

Ava: 2: No, no, I swear I heard this on a Vanity album a few years back... == capturing-the-rush

Moderator: 2: more bisexual vampires in bondage, and it still bites == vamp.2

Michael: 2: Little did she know he was actually the elevator repairman... == capturing-the-rush

Moderator: 2: it's really hard reviewing erotica this bad. It's worse when the author is one of your co-workers. == knows-all-bounds

Moderator: 2: horny man separated from equally horny woman. Yawn. == fond-memories

Moderator: 2: heard it before == kiss+make-up

Moderator: 2: guh == sis-in-law

Moderator: 2: grotesque in parts, burlesque of romance == streetwalker

Moderator: 2: free verse "Penthouse Forum" is not poetry == poem-951112.1

Moderator: 2: formulaic == open-stranger

Moderator: 2: cheap paperback style writing. == ronsgame

Michael: 2: Can we see the Spice Girls cover this anytime soon? Or maybe Sushi K? == capturing-the-rush

Moderator: 2: boring == drifter

Michael: 2: Attractive affluent heterosexual couple achieves mutual orgasms, next on _Geraldo_ == white-silk-pjs

Moderator: 2: are we there yet? == moses

Moderator: 2: an evening with Velvet Jones == primal-rhythm

Moderator: 2: a distinct odor of cheese == lady-of-the-keep

Moderator: 2: I don't buy it == summer

Moderator: 2: Fine writing, even though the misogyny bothers me == androgenous

Michael: 2: *shrug* maybe poetry's not my thing == gist

Ava: 2: "Love in an ele..." Oh, never mind. == capturing-the-rush

Moderator: 2: "It's the Fuck Boat / something trite and cliched..." == caribb-fant

Ava: 2: tomorrow night, I get the spellchecker! == the-seminar

Ava: 2: this could have been hot if it had been done by someone who could write == knows-all-bounds

Ava: 2: size queen, eh? Hate to burst your bubble, but girls`are all == horny

Ava: 2: lazy free verse; what hath e.e. cummings wrought? Read some Erica Jong to see how this is done _right_. == poem-951112.1

Ava: 2: either that, or Shakes The Clown has taken up writing erotica == grand-round

Ava: 2: could have been interesting, but awkwardly written, and the ending is the oldest cliche in the book == romeo

Ava: 2: awkward and confusing. Is this what Freud meant by transference? == doctors-orders

Ava: 2: aren't you glad you use Dial? Don't you wish _everyone_ did? == central-sex

Ava: 2: all the right elements, put together the _wrong_ way == vamp.2

Ava: 2: "Working Girl" meets "The Story of O", minus Sigourney Weaver == slave2desire.1

Michael: 2: "I went to Camp Comoniwanalayya, and all I was got was this lousy venereal disease." The 70s nostalgia should not extend to the porn movie "plots" of the era. == summer-camp

Michael: 2: "And then Nate threw the television out of the motel window..." Reeks of junior high school fanfic, sorry. == the-roadie

Moderator: 1: would be hotter as a Spinal Tap song. Or maybe 2 Live Crew. == feel-hands

Moderator: 1: worthless == mary+vet

Moderator: 1: why hetboys shouldn't write ff porn == tender-years

X-Ava-Review: 1: Why couldn't he have just put the hamster in a little plane for the science fair? == smell-of-lust.12

Ava: 1: wet t-shirt night in space == huts

X-Ava-Review: 1: we're reading this because we have to, Gentle Reader. What's your excuse? Masochism? == smell-of-lust.10

X-Ava-Review: 1: Waldorf: "Yeah. They're on the first train out of town!" == smell-of-lust.14

Moderator: 1: viewing "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" does _not_ count as historical research == time-travel.2

Moderator: 1: uuencoded perl would be more erotic == smell-of-lust.9

Michael: 1: Turnabout stories are always welcome, and I know more than a few men who would benefit from such a treatment. But the alternating narrative is too weak to carry the story. == the-power

Moderator: 1: true fetishist material, in every sense of the phrase. Not for the faint of stomach. == central-sex

Moderator: 1: the usual to be expected == tony-slaves.4

Moderator: 1: The rationale behind breaking this up into _fifteen_ parts eludes me == smell-of-lust.2

Moderator: 1: The rationale behind breaking this up into _fifteen_ par == smell-of-lust.2

Ava: 1: The rationale behind _writing_ this eludes me == smell-of-lust.2

X-Ava-Review: 1: The rationale behind _writing_ this eludes me == smell-of-lust.2

Moderator: 1: the only thing missing is the 900 number == jane+colleen

Moderator: 1: sure, whatever == head-n-weed

Moderator: 1: Statler: "Have you got good tickets for the sequel to this story?" == smell-of-lust.14

Moderator: 1: pointless == susan

Moderator: 1: please remain seated until the captain has turned off the 'no seizures' sign. Thank you, and have a pleasant life. == smell-of-lust.15

Moderator: 1: no, thanks == tony-slaves.3

Moderator: 1: no thanks == twins

Moderator: 1: my brain hurts. ugh. == huts

X-Ava-Review: 1: much more of this, and I'll swear off sex for good == smell-of-lust.6

Ava: 1: Michael, I'm frightened. There's thirteen more parts. Hold me. == smell-of-lust.1

X-Ava-Review: 1: Michael, I'm frightened. There's thirteen more parts. Hold me. == smell-of-lust.1

Moderator: 1: like Suicidal Tendencies songs done as erotica (think "Institutionalized") == grand-round

X-Ava-Review: 1: Lavonne: "O-o-o-h yeahhhhhhh." == smell-of-lust.13

Moderator: 1: KID'S SCENT FIX CHICKS == smell-of-list.5

X-Ava-Review: 1: it would probably have better grammar, too == smell-of-lust.9

Ava: 1: It was short? == smell-of-lust.4

X-Ava-Review: 1: It was short? == smell-of-lust.4

Michael: 1: If repeated excessive brutalization and humiliation of women turns you on, just read your local crime blotter. :-P == i-am-rapist

Moderator: 1: I want to try and find _something_ nice to say about this... == smell-of-lust.4

Moderator: 1: I want to try and find _something_ nice to say about thi == smell-of-lust.4

Moderator: 1: huh? == doctors-orders

Moderator: 1: Utterly abominable. Kids, if you're going to try and write historical fiction -- DO SOME RESEARCH! == time-travel.1

Moderator: 1: How _Not_ to Write Erotica 101 == romeo

Moderator: 1: Hot for Teacher? == smell-of-lust.12

X-Ava-Review: 1: free at last, free at last, praise God almighty, free at last! == smell-of-lust.15

Moderator: 1: four paragraphs. Four paragraphs is a chapter? == smell-of-lust.7

Moderator: 1: David was a virgin, and it appears the author is as well == smell-of-lust.6

Moderator: 1: Butthead: "Stop in the name of all that does not suck!" == smell-of-lust.11

X-Ava-Review: 1: Beavis: "I am the great Cornholio. Give me Toilet Water for my bunghole!" == smell-of-lust.11

X-Ava-Review: 1: be glad it's only four. <whimper> Are we done yet? == smell-of-lust.7

Moderator: 1: Barry: "We've got two hundred dollars worth of Toilet Water." == smell-of-lust.13

Moderator: 1: at least there's no sex in this one. (I never thought I'd have to say that.) == smell-of-lust.10

Moderator: 1: abandon all hope, all ye who pass these gates == smell-of-lust.1

Moderator: 1: there are insufficient keywords to describe _this_ one == crying-baby

Ava: 1: this reads more like "Robin Hood: Men in Tights" was the research material == time-travel.2

Ava: 1: obviously, Jane and Colleen were not hired for their typing skills == jane+colleen

Ava: 1: it's not like this is _writing_ or anything. <sigh> == tender-years

Ava: 1: is Leonard Nimoy going to record this soon? == feel-hands

X-Ava-Review: 1: "Well, if you want to find hell with me, I can show you what it's like..." == smell-of-list.5

Ava: 1: "Well, if you want to find hell with me, I can show you what i == smell-of-list.5

Moderator: 1: "There once was a man named Oedipus Rex / You may have heard about his odd complex" == smell-of-lust.8

Ava: 1: "M'lady Guenevere, do you ever get that ... not so fresh feeling?" == time-travel.1

Moderator: [none; not yet approved] == (quarry)

Moderator: [none; not yet approved] == (mindfuck)

Moderator: [none; not yet approved] == (knob)

Moderator: [none; not yet approved] == (dream)

Moderator: [none; not yet approved] == (coerce)

Moderator: [none; not moderator approved] == fuck-exon

Moderator: [none; admin post] == [admin062595]

Moderator: [none; admin post] == [admin-960121]

Moderator: [none; admin post] == [admin-960107]

Moderator: [lost] == 2nd-chances-1

Moderator: [lost] == LG-hottub2

Moderator: [lost] == abraham-sarah

Moderator: [lost] == adam-and-eve

Moderator: [lost] == aging.the.silk

Moderator: [lost] == anniversary-cake

Moderator: [lost] == anticipation

Moderator: [lost] == anytime

Moderator: [lost] == at-the-movies

Moderator: [lost] == blind

Moderator: [lost] == congenial

Moderator: [lost] == d-old.friends

Moderator: [lost] == eng-vacation.1

Moderator: [lost] == eng-vacation.2

Moderator: [lost] == eng-vacation.3

Moderator: [lost] == est-flwrs-01-1

Moderator: [lost] == est-flwrs-01-2

Moderator: [lost] == est-flwrs-01-3

Moderator: [lost] == evening-out

Moderator: [lost] == firstlove

Moderator: [lost] == girl-eyes

Moderator: [lost] == good-morning

Moderator: [lost] == great-train

Moderator: [lost] == hard-as-rails

Moderator: [lost] == helping-hand

Moderator: [lost] == isaac-rebecca

Moderator: [lost] == jacob-leah

Moderator: [lost] == judah-and-tamar

Moderator: [lost] == lot

Moderator: [lost] == middle.of.night

Moderator: [lost] == mild-obsess

Moderator: [lost] == new-scarf

Moderator: [lost] == noah

Moderator: [lost] == not-self-pollu

Moderator: [lost] == offering

Moderator: [lost] == p-kitten

Moderator: [lost] == perhaps

Moderator: [lost] == powershop.pt1

Moderator: [lost] == powershop.pt2

Moderator: [lost] == recherche

Moderator: [lost] == religious-exp

Moderator: [lost] == snowed-in-1

Moderator: [lost] == snowed-in-2

Moderator: [lost] == sonata

Moderator: [lost] == tasty.fantasy

Moderator: [lost] == vernon-c

Ava: [none; not yet approved] == (quarry)

Ava: [none; not yet approved] == (mindfuck)

Ava: [none; not yet approved] == (knob)

Ava: [none; not yet approved] == (dream)

Ava: [none; not yet approved] == (coerce)

X-Ava-Review: 1: "His name appears in Freud's index / Because he loved his mother" == smell-of-lust.8

Back to the main index.

Comments on this archive?